From: Alastair D'Silva
> Sent: 15 April 2019 11:45
...
> > Although I think you'd want a 'no hex' flag to suppress the hex.
> >
> > Probably more useful flags are ones to suppress the address column.
>
> This is already supported by the prefix_type parameter - are you proposing
> that we eliminate the
> parameter & combine it with flags?
I was looking at the flags on one of my hexdump() functions...
> > I've also used flags to enable (or disable) suppression of multiple lines of
> > zeros of constant bytes.
> > In that case you may want hexdump to return the flags for the next call when
> > a large buffer is being dumped in fragments.
>
> I'm afraid I don't quite follow here, hex_dump_to_buffer doesn't alter the
> flags,
> so the caller already knows it.
If you are suppressing lines of zeros and dumping a buffer in several blocks
then subsequent calls need to know that the last line of the previous call
was suppressed zeros - and carry on with the same suppressed block.
I've not looked to see if it does support suppressing lines of zeros/0xff.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT,
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
