On 01/10/2017 06:57 PM, Kershner, David A wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Abdul Rauf Mujahid [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:51 PM
>> To: Kershner, David A <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]; [email protected]; *S-Par-Maintainer
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Kershner, David A wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Abdul Rauf [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:24 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; *S-Par-Maintainer
>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning
>>> This patch has the same subject line as the previous patch? Which one
>>> should we use? Or can you make the names unique?
>>>
>>> David Kershner
>>>
>>>> Fix the following warnings:
>>>> Block comments should align the * on each line
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rauf <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> index 336af52d43d7..4e630ea527e8 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c
>>>> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct
>>>> controlvm_message *inmsg)
>>>>             *
>>>>             * devices are automatically enabled at
>>>>             * initialization.
>>>> -          */
>>>> +           */
>>>>            parahotplug_request_kickoff(req);
>>>>            controlvm_respond_physdev_changestate
>>>>                    (&inmsg->hdr,
>>>> --
>>>> 2.11.0
>> you should use both of them. I am sending both again by changing their
>> names.
> Thanks!
>
> David Kershner
Please ignore these two patches.
I sent another patch yesterday after merging these two patches in one with 
subject:
[PATCH] staging: unisys: visorbus: fix checkpatch block comments warning.
Thanks.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to