> -----Original Message----- > From: Abdul Rauf Mujahid [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:51 PM > To: Kershner, David A <[email protected]>; > [email protected]; [email protected]; *S-Par-Maintainer > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning > > > > On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Kershner, David A wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Abdul Rauf [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 6:24 PM > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; *S-Par-Maintainer > >> <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: [PATCH] staging: unisys: fix checkpatch block comments warning > > This patch has the same subject line as the previous patch? Which one > > should we use? Or can you make the names unique? > > > > David Kershner > > > >> Fix the following warnings: > >> Block comments should align the * on each line > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rauf <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c > >> b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c > >> index 336af52d43d7..4e630ea527e8 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c > >> +++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c > >> @@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ parahotplug_process_message(struct > >> controlvm_message *inmsg) > >> * > >> * devices are automatically enabled at > >> * initialization. > >> - */ > >> + */ > >> parahotplug_request_kickoff(req); > >> controlvm_respond_physdev_changestate > >> (&inmsg->hdr, > >> -- > >> 2.11.0 > you should use both of them. I am sending both again by changing their > names.
Thanks! David Kershner _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
