Jon Smirl wrote:
I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith
wrote the code  so I'm not sure what he intentions were.

--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work
for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but the i810 drivers is only on
version 1.0,

Is there any need for this to be checked at all should the _SOLO defines
in utils.c:driCheckDriDdxDrmVersions be extended to cover the DDX check?

There's no need to check the faked up numbers. Feel free to patch them out of existence, if possible.


Keith



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to