I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith
wrote the code  so I'm not sure what he intentions were.

--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work
> for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but the i810 drivers is only on
> version 1.0,
> 
> Is there any need for this to be checked at all should the _SOLO defines
> in utils.c:driCheckDriDdxDrmVersions be extended to cover the DDX check?
> 
> Dave.
> 
> -- 
> David Airlie, Software Engineer
> http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
> pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mesa3d-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev


=====
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to