On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 18:08, Jon Smirl wrote: > Same patch again with Matrox PCI IDs fixed and a linux-2.4 port. The patches > are almost identical. Both against current bitkeeper source. > > Can people in the know please check the PCI IDs for the other hardware? I'm > fairly sure Radeon, Rage128, and Matrox are right but the others haven't been > checked.
I'm still working on cleaning the PCI ID stuff up to be portable, which I'll commit as soon as I test (I'm trying to get a multihead setup going to see if there are problems with that as Michel Daenzer brought up). Notably, I'm not using pci_ids.h and instead using the values themselves as has been done in the BSD drivers. I believe I have all the correct PCI IDs, but I'll take another look against your list. Is there any value in the families enum that's being associated with each pci id? After that I'll see how hard the versioning ioctl thing would be to try to save us needing to add too many new ioctls for smallish changes like these. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
