On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 03:08, Jon Smirl wrote: > Same patch again with Matrox PCI IDs fixed and a linux-2.4 port. The patches > are almost identical. Both against current bitkeeper source. > > Can people in the know please check the PCI IDs for the other hardware? I'm > fairly sure Radeon, Rage128, and Matrox are right but the others haven't been > checked.
For radeonfb, I'm moving away from linux pci_ids.h list. It's just too much hell to keep in sync and is always a patch reject nightmare... At least for now, and until it's "finished", my new radeonfb uses a separate file I stuffed in drivers/video/aty/ that contains a copy of XFree ATI PCI IDs. I may go back to pci_ids.h once the driver is complete enough, but I'd prefer not doing so, that would help keeping in sync with XFree. BTW. Another problem I've been reported recently, at least on one case, the BIOS ROM wasn't properly read on an x86 (signature was 0). I have to investigate more, but since the old driver worked, I tend to think the memory image may have been correct. I wonder about allowing for some kind of fallback here... Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
