Brian Paul wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:

Here's the list of reversions (either from 4.x to 3.x or from a later 4.x to an earlier 4.x). I don't think the files in src/X matter, but t_context.c and t_imm_dlist.c sure should. IMHO, we should update the trunk to whatever version of the dlist code has Brian's recent dlist memory management changes.

The (vertex buffer) memory changes are in the Mesa CVS trunk. I haven't back-ported these changes to the 5.0.x branch because I'm not 100% sure they're safe yet (I may be overly paranoid here). It would probably take a few hours to back-port.

Okay. It might be better to release 5.1 first so that it gets tested by a wider audience.


Is there any chance that we'll get Mesa 5.2 anytime soon? Then we could just suck everything over and be happy. :)

I haven't released 5.1 (devel release) yet so 5.2 (stable release) won't be coming for a while. 5.1 is in pretty good shape though. I'm trying to decide if I should do the directory re-org before or after the 5.1 release. Thoughts?

Sooner would be better, IMO.




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to