David Dawes wrote:
First thing I notice is somebody's disabled dri on radeon 9000's (rv250's). Added a comment indicating that they didn't know if they were doing the right thing or not, which is kindof dump -- if you don't know, don't make the change. Or ask here, I guess.On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:44:15PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 07:02:50PM +0100, Michel D�nzer wrote:On Sam, 2002-12-14 at 18:42, Michel Daenzer wrote:CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared/drm/kernel/ Changes by: mdaenzer@sc8-pr-cvs1. 02/12/14 09:42:48 Log message: merge changes from trunk since Mesa 5.0 mergeOkay, I think that should fix the most pressing issues people think were fixed by the Mesa 5.0 merge.Thanks for doing that! I've taken that and merged it into the XFree86 trunk. I've also merged the XFree86 trunk back into mesa-4-0-4-branch, but I'm not having much success in committing it. My first commit attempt aborted, then I couldn't connect to the CVS repository for a while, then trying again just now it's failing because there are various locks in the repositoryfrom the first aborted attempt.Anyway, the pre-merge tag is "mesa-4-0-4-20021214" and when I can finally finish committing the merge, the post-merge tag will be "mesa-4-0-4-20021215".The SourceForge admins cleared the locks, and I've finshed committing the merge. The part of this merge that I'm least sure of is the 2D radeon driver. It'd be a big help if someone could take a look at the merged code and let me know of any problems. I've put a diff between those before and after tags at <http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/mesa404-20021214-15.diff.gz>.
Also the option to turn off the depth buffer (introduced in the twc work) has been either knobbled or removed. This may not have been deliberate, hard to tell. This seems to be the second round of removing this -- or alternatly maybe it was only half merged to xfree in the first place. In any case it seems to be gone now.
I don't know the story behind the removal of RADEONSaveFBDevRegisters() -- seems to be related to keeping pageflipping working over an fbdev call. Can anyone comment on whether or not this is still necessary?
Keith
Keith
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
