In all honesty ... I haven't run to any issues with the Mesa 5.x based stuff. Remember - I also take the time to merge the current DRI code back into the the XFree86 CVS repository before I build a release. I picked up a copy of Wolfenstein a week or so back just so I could stress test things and so far I have had no issues with it. It works great!
As a side note ... the code that I compile is bundled into RPMS based off of Mike Harris' devel XFree86 RPMS. I am willing to allow other people to use them to test code, but .... they need to realize that they shouldn't bug RedHat or Mike Harris about issues they find in them! Since I am the only one using them, I usually don't change the name of the packager or distributer ... I guess if anyone is really interested in these RPMS I could go back and do that. On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Don, 2002-12-12 at 15:29, Martin Spott wrote: > > > XFree86 4.3 is going to go with a Mesa 4.0.x-based DRI because of time > > > constraints and stability concerns. [...] > > > > I didn't notice the Mesa-5.x-based stuff is less stable than the stuff you > > chose for XFree86-4.3, > > I'd mostly agree, but I guess the floating point exceptions are > showstoppers. > > > -- //========================================================\\ || D. Hageman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || \\========================================================// ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
