Andrew James Richardson wrote: > > Hello there, > > I've been avidly looking at the DRI web site on the status page to see if > there is any mention of the main CVS trunk code being Mesa 4.x yet. For me > this is quite important as I have patches to Mesa 4.x for SMP > vertex/light/tex trans that I wrote ~6 months ago and have been dying to try > out. > Just going into why I have not said anything before: I tested my patches by > disabling rasterization all together in Mesa 4.x (what ever version CVS I > downloaded) (Oh and yes while I rem. Keith: its a dam sight cleaner now > thanks to you.) This was because a software buffer clear was the bottle > neck, something that should not be the case with h/w accell. And its > all very well seeing you code whizz off 2x as fast with no pictures but its > something else to actually see it, a proof and pudding agument. So I've > been waiting for Mesa 4.x to become std in the CVS trunk so I can fiddle > with it. > > So my question stands, what is the status of Mesa 4.x and the DRI trunk and > much more importantly tdfx and Mesa 4.x. I also have a g200 agp but would > rather go with tdfx. Also before I get my hands dirty again what is the sate > of play with tnl and g200 and tdfx, where in the rendering pipeline does Mesa > hand over to the hardware? >
We're hoping to do the merge asap. However, nothing's stopping you just working against the branch - I don't expect anything major to change between now and the merge. Keith _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
