Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, David Johnson wrote: > >>There is some seriously proprietary stuff with idct that for legal >>reasons ATI wouldn't want to expose. >> > > That is one of the most ridiculous statements I have heard. Substitute > some equivalent terms in there: > > "There is some seriously proprietary stuff with the Pythagorean Theorem > that for legal reasons ATI wouldn't want to expose." > > "There is some seriously proprietary stuff with the quadratic equation > that for legal reasons ATI wouldn't want to expose."
Okay then... I think what David's suggesting is that ATI's implementation of an iDCT in hardware is pretty cool, and they're not about to go and tell everyone how they did it. Last time I checked, they were the only vendor to offer such a solution, and thus you may want to consider their position on the matter. -- Gareth _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
