On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 11:34:16AM +0000, Laurentiu Palcu wrote:
> Add display controller and LDB support in imx943.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Palcu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi | 53 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi
> index 657c81b6016f2..9a91beef54e86 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ l3_cache: l3-cache {
>               };
>       };
>  
> -     clock-ldb-pll-div7 {
> +     clock_ldb_pll_div7: clock-ldb-pll-div7 {
>               compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
>               #clock-cells = <0>;
>               clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_LDBPLL>;
> @@ -174,9 +174,60 @@ dispmix_csr: syscon@4b010000 {
>               lvds_csr: syscon@4b0c0000 {
>                       compatible = "nxp,imx94-lvds-csr", "syscon";
>                       reg = <0x0 0x4b0c0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> +                     #address-cells = <1>;
> +                     #size-cells = <1>;
>                       clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_DISPAPB>;
>                       #clock-cells = <1>;
>                       power-domains = <&scmi_devpd IMX94_PD_DISPLAY>;
> +
> +                     ldb: ldb@4 {
> +                             compatible = "fsl,imx94-ldb";

Should this be moved to imx94.dtsi, since the compatible string doesn't
seem to be i.MX943 specific?

> +                             reg = <0x4 0x4>, <0x8 0x4>;
> +                             reg-names = "ldb", "lvds";
> +                             clocks = <&lvds_csr 
> IMX94_CLK_DISPMIX_LVDS_CLK_GATE>;
> +                             clock-names = "ldb";
> +                             status = "disabled";
> +
> +                             ports {
> +                                     #address-cells = <1>;
> +                                     #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +                                     port@0 {
> +                                             reg = <0>;
> +
> +                                             lvds_in: endpoint {
> +                                                     remote-endpoint = 
> <&dcif_out>;
> +                                             };
> +                                     };
> +
> +                                     port@1 {
> +                                             reg = <1>;
> +                                     };
> +                             };
> +                     };
> +             };
> +
> +             dcif: display-controller@4b120000 {
> +                     compatible = "nxp,imx94-dcif";

Same here.

> +                     reg = <0x0 0x4b120000 0x0 0x300000>;
> +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 377 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                  <GIC_SPI 378 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                  <GIC_SPI 379 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                     interrupt-names = "common", "bg_layer", "fg_layer";
> +                     clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_DISPAPB>,
> +                              <&scmi_clk IMX94_CLK_DISPAXI>,
> +                              <&dispmix_csr IMX94_CLK_DISPMIX_CLK_SEL>;
> +                     clock-names = "apb", "axi", "pix";
> +                     assigned-clocks = <&dispmix_csr 
> IMX94_CLK_DISPMIX_CLK_SEL>;
> +                     assigned-clock-parents = <&clock_ldb_pll_div7>;
> +                     power-domains = <&scmi_devpd IMX94_PD_DISPLAY>;
> +                     status = "disabled";
> +
> +                     port {
> +                             dcif_out: endpoint {
> +                                     remote-endpoint = <&lvds_in>;
> +                             };
> +                     };
>               };
>       };
>  };
> 

-- 
Regards,
Liu Ying

Reply via email to