On 24/11/2025 18:42, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>>> >>>> Ah, sure. Yes, if both identities work I would propose to skip >>>> second >>>> SoB. But I also stopped objecting of having two identities >>>> listed, as >>>> long as they are correct. >>> >>> Well it's unfortunate that some policy now requires me to list the >>> second identity. >> >> No policy asked you... > > Local policy here, sigh...
It sounded like you complain about our process... > >> >>> >>> Should I resend the whole patchset with the ISCAS mail? >> >> You can, it probably would solve the issue, unless you change the >> author, but why you cannot do what I asked at the beginning - set >> correct order of SoBs, so the @icenowy.me being the last? > > Well because previous revisions of the patch comes with only > @icenowy.me SoB, and I think SoB is append-only... You cannot change other people SoB, but your own you can. Best regards, Krzysztof
