On 24/11/2025 12:13, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 在 2025-11-24星期一的 12:09 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： >> On 24/11/2025 12:04, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>> 在 2025-11-24星期一的 12:01 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： >>>> On 24/11/2025 11:52, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >>>>> Verisilicon has a series of display controllers prefixed with >>>>> DC >>>>> and >>>>> with self-identification facility like their GC series GPUs. >>>>> >>>>> Add a device tree binding for it. >>>>> >>>>> Depends on the specific DC model, it can have either one or two >>>>> display >>>>> outputs, and each display output could be set to DPI signal or >>>>> "DP" >>>>> signal (which seems to be some plain parallel bus to HDMI >>>>> controllers). >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <[email protected]> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Wrong DCO chain order. You send it as icenowy.me, so this must be >>>> last >>>> SoB. This identity is the last one certifying DCO. Please kindly >>>> read >>>> submitting patches, so you know what you are certifying here. >>> >>> Well I mapped the @iscas.ac.cn mail to the @icenowy.me one in the >>> last >>> patch. >>> >>> Or maybe I should make it the first patch? >> >> .mailmap has effect on b4 and git send-email, so maybe that's the >> answer. The problem is that: >> 1. This email has sender address @icenowy.me >> 2. It's SoB is not the last one. > > Well, I think a patch that is already sent shouldn't have the From > field changing when bumping revision, and a patch modified by one > identity should have the modifying one's SoB added. > > So here I am using the @icenowy.me mail (which can represent the > @iscas.ac.cn mail according to the mailmap) to send the patch that is > processed by @iscas.ac.cn mail. > > Sending the patch with @iscas.ac.cn mail needs some extra setup > (because of some weird security requirement).
I did not ask you to change from. Please read carefully "You send it as icenowy.me, so this must be last sob" and later I re-iterated. If you insist on not fixing the chain, that's a NAK from me because you must follow the DCO process. Best regards, Krzysztof
