On 10/20/2025, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Liu, Hi Fabio,
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 1:12 AM Liu Ying <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Strictly speaking, I don't think i.MX6SX LCDIF is compatible with i.MX28 >> LCDIF >> because at least i.MX28 LCDIF has the version and debug{0,1,2} registers(at >> 0x1c0, 0x1d0, 0x1e0 and 0x1f0) while i.MX6SX LCDIF hasn't. > > There are some DT users, such as Barebox that matches against > fsl,imx28-lcdif, so we cannot remove it. Hmmm, it looks like software projects like Barebox don't really follow this DT binding. Is it possible to fix Barebox to avoid changing this DT binding by this patch? I'm assuming that Uboot has already been fixed. > > In my first attempt, I tried removing it: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/ > > but this was rejected due to potential dtb compatibility breakage: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/ -- Regards, Liu Ying
