On 10/16/25 12:34 PM, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Thu Oct 16, 2025 at 9:28 PM CEST, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Oct 16, 2025, at 1:48 PM, Yury Norov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 11:13:21AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
...
> While I'm not super opinionated for general bitfields, for the register!()
> infrastructure I very much prefer the hi:lo notation, as this is the common
> notation in datasheets and TRMs.
>
> However, if we use hi:lo, we should use it decending, i.e.:
>
Sure, descending works.
> bitfield! {
> struct ControlReg {
> 7:5 state as u8 => State;
> 3:0 mode as u8 ?=> Mode;
And hi:lo matches our HW reference manuals. And if you're dealing
with bitfields, you are often also dealing with HW, so this is
a reasonable place in the SW to use hi:lo.
Looks good to me.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
