Hi Geert,

> This needs a dummy for compile-testing the CONFIG_CLK_RZG2L=n case.

OK, thank you.

I will add one and post v3.

Thank you,
Chris



-----Original Message-----
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 9:42 AM
To: Chris Brandt <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Turquette <[email protected]>; Stephen Boyd 
<[email protected]>; Biju Das <[email protected]>; Maarten Lankhorst 
<[email protected]>; Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>; Thomas 
Zimmermann <[email protected]>; David Airlie <[email protected]>; Simona 
Vetter <[email protected]>; Hien Huynh <[email protected]>; Nghia Vo 
<[email protected]>; Hugo Villeneuve <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: renesas: rzg2l: Remove DSI clock rate 
restrictions

Hi Chris,

On Fri, 12 Sept 2025 at 16:22, Chris Brandt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Convert the limited MIPI clock calculations to a full range of 
> settings based on math including H/W limitation validation.
> Since the required DSI division setting must be specified from 
> external sources before calculations, expose a new API to set it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: hienhuynh <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nghia Vo <[email protected]>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/include/linux/clk/renesas.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk/renesas.h
> @@ -33,3 +33,7 @@ void cpg_mssr_detach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *unused, 
> struct device *dev);
>  #define cpg_mssr_detach_dev    NULL
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_RZG2L
> +void rzg2l_cpg_dsi_div_set_divider(int divider, int target); #endif

This needs a dummy for compile-testing the CONFIG_CLK_RZG2L=n case.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But 
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to