On 10/14/2025, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 10/13/25 6:49 PM, Frank Li wrote: > > Hello Frank, > >>> @@ -90,13 +102,15 @@ patternProperties: >>> compatible: >>> const: fsl,imx8qxp-dc-signature >>> >>> - "^tcon@[0-9a-f]+$": >>> + "^tcon(@[0-9a-f]+)?$": >> >> why here allow no address unit tcon? > This might be something Liu can clarify too. > > TCON on iMX95 DPU does not seem to exist at all, or at least has no control > registers. Hence no address.
i.MX95 DC hasn't got TCON so it should not be documented for i.MX95 DC. -- Regards, Liu Ying
