On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 05:00:26PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > There is a comment here which says that DIV_ROUND_UP() and that's where > the problem comes from. Say you pick: > > args->bpp = UINT_MAX - 7; > args->width = 4; > args->height = 1; > > The integer overflow in DIV_ROUND_UP() means "cpp" is UINT_MAX / 8 and > because of how we picked args->width that means cpp < UINT_MAX / 4. > > I've fixed it by preventing the integer overflow in DIV_ROUND_UP(). I > removed the check for !cpp because it's not possible after this change. > I also changed all the 0xffffffffU references to U32_MAX. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > --- > v2: additional cleanups
Thanks a lot for respinning, applied to drm-misc-fixes. -Daniel > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c > index 39ac15ce4702..9e2ae02f31e0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dumb_buffers.c > @@ -65,12 +65,13 @@ int drm_mode_create_dumb_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, > return -EINVAL; > > /* overflow checks for 32bit size calculations */ > - /* NOTE: DIV_ROUND_UP() can overflow */ > + if (args->bpp > U32_MAX - 8) > + return -EINVAL; > cpp = DIV_ROUND_UP(args->bpp, 8); > - if (!cpp || cpp > 0xffffffffU / args->width) > + if (cpp > U32_MAX / args->width) > return -EINVAL; > stride = cpp * args->width; > - if (args->height > 0xffffffffU / stride) > + if (args->height > U32_MAX / stride) > return -EINVAL; > > /* test for wrap-around */ > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
