On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:32:42PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On pe, 2017-02-17 at 18:35 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > The code currently assumes that all fence arrays it sees are the normal
> > signal-on-all variety, and decomposes the array into its individual
> > fences so that it can extract the native i915 fences. If the fence array
> > is using signal-on-any, we should not decompose as we must not wait on
> > them all, just the first in *that* set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> > CC: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
>
> <SNIP>
>
> >
> > @@ -696,7 +696,8 @@ i915_gem_request_await_dma_fence(struct
> > drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> > if (dma_fence_is_i915(fence))
> > return i915_gem_request_await_request(req, to_request(fence));
> >
> > - if (!dma_fence_is_array(fence)) {
> > + if (!dma_fence_is_array(fence) ||
> > + test_bit(DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ANY, &fence->flags)) {
>
> Smells like a helper function? While that helper is finding the way
> upstream;
Blurgh.
enum dma_fence_array_signal_mode {
DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ON_ALL = 0,
DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ON_ANY,
};
enum dma_fence_array_signal_mode
dma_fence_array_get_signaling_mode(struct dma_fence_array *array)
{
return test_bit(DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ANY, &array->base.flags) ?
DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ON_ANY : DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ON_ALL;
}
if (!dma_fence_is_array(fence) ||
dma_fence_array_get_signaling_mode(to_dma_fence_array(fence)) ==
DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ON_ANY)
Hmm. Not happy with that yet.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
