On pe, 2017-02-17 at 18:35 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The code currently assumes that all fence arrays it sees are the normal
> signal-on-all variety, and decomposes the array into its individual
> fences so that it can extract the native i915 fences. If the fence array
> is using signal-on-any, we should not decompose as we must not wait on
> them all, just the first in *that* set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
> CC: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

<SNIP>

> 
> @@ -696,7 +696,8 @@ i915_gem_request_await_dma_fence(struct 
> drm_i915_gem_request *req,
>       if (dma_fence_is_i915(fence))
>               return i915_gem_request_await_request(req, to_request(fence));
>  
> -     if (!dma_fence_is_array(fence)) {
> +     if (!dma_fence_is_array(fence) ||
> +         test_bit(DMA_FENCE_ARRAY_SIGNAL_ANY, &fence->flags)) {

Smells like a helper function? While that helper is finding the way
upstream;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to