> > Unfortunately, the IETF only standardized full transfers of the root zone > > Where? Which RFC?
In the hypothetical case that we would look at the current operation of the root create a standard based on that. > I very much doubt any distribution network would notice transfers > of the root zone even if they went looking for them. It'll be lost > in the noise of serving up cat videos, smut, social media garbage, > OS updates, etc. It's been a while, and I don't recall the exact numbers, but some time ago I looked at an estimate of how often a copy of the root would be needed if all recursors switch to local root. I used root priming queries for that. If you take that number and multiply it by the 1.4 MB that an AXFR of the root currently takes then you'll get a pretty big number. That doesn't say we must do or do not do something. Just that in my opinion we shouldn't give too much weight to how the root is currently signed. If we think that CDNs for the root are essentially for free, then let's just write that down. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
