Can we have both? RFC that says “there is no order in DNS” and having a section on “However, things might go boom”?
That way we don’t codify a bad practice, we codify a good practice and document the bad one. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > On 15. 1. 2026, at 0:45, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, to me, a document which says something like "While records are ethnically > unordered, if you want your implementation to work in the real world, you > need to put them in this order A → B → C.". _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
