> On 12 Nov 2025, at 12:53 am, Ray Bellis <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08/11/2025 20:30, Joe Abley wrote: >> On 8 Nov 2025, at 15:19, Peter Thomassen >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> We should clarify that the root must remain without an address >>> record. >> That definitely seems like truth. I am not sure whether this >> document is the right place to say it out loud, but I don't have a >> strong opinion. > > That's very likely in RZERC's remit, not IETF's. >
I doubt it Ray. Informally, I'd suggest that RZERC is there to formalise conventional views of the content of the root zone - it's not supposed to take the lead! If the IETF consensus process comes up with a considered document that contemplates such a change to the content of the root zone then I would guess its RZERC's role to follow in those tracks with a proposal to formalise it. The path followed by ZONEMD is a good example of this process. Geoff (currently serving as Chair of RZERC, but not speaking for RZERC here) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
