On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:12:34 +0200 Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2025, at 01:42, Vadim Goncharov <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, then simple question: why nobody uses full binary in TXT records, > > then? > > Who is this "nobody" of whom you speak? RFC6763 definitely uses full binary. > Unicode uses full binary. Well, do you have survey data showing such usage in TXT records on mass scale? If not (and it seems not), then what explanations do you have to such fact? We all know that standard allows full binary, that was told in the very beginning of thread and that is not the question. > The fact that some DNS web UI doesn't support this is an indictment of web > UIs, not a DNS issue. If you want DNS to work, don't use web UIs to set up > your zone files. What about e.g. people who have no choice? In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not. (c) -- WBR, @nuclight _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
