On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:21 PM Petr Špaček <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25. 06. 25 11:39, Willem Toorop wrote: > > Dear dnsop, > > > > We have a new version of the Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers > > draft addressing the feedback received during the previous last call. > > > > * We changed the abstract to reflect that the algorithms described in > > the document are optional and that the document describes the > > benefits and considerations of using this approach. > > I like the new Abstract and new Introduction. Also thank for the new > section 4. Limiting upgrading NS Credibility, this is important to > document. > Thanks! > I think beginning of section 2. Motivation was forgotten. Right now it > says: > > > This document > > aims to bring more commonality and predictability by standardizing > > the behavior in a way that comports with the DNS protocol. > > This somewhat contradicts the new Abstract and Intro which say this is > all optional. Noted. Yes, we'll update this section to bring it in line. > Also Intended status: Standards Track is confusing. > Why is it confusing? Standards Track does not mean mandatory to implement. (I've encouraged other folks to write up another standards track draft to describe alternative ways to do referral processing.) Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
