On 25. 06. 25 11:39, Willem Toorop wrote:
Dear dnsop,
We have a new version of the Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers
draft addressing the feedback received during the previous last call.
* We changed the abstract to reflect that the algorithms described in
the document are optional and that the document describes the
benefits and considerations of using this approach.
I like the new Abstract and new Introduction. Also thank for the new
section 4. Limiting upgrading NS Credibility, this is important to document.
I think beginning of section 2. Motivation was forgotten. Right now it
says:
This document
aims to bring more commonality and predictability by standardizing
> the behavior in a way that comports with the DNS protocol.
This somewhat contradicts the new Abstract and Intro which say this is
all optional. Also Intended status: Standards Track is confusing.
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
