Tommy Jensen <[email protected]> writes: > Happy Second to Last I-D Submission Day!
It always brings interesting discussions to dnsop (I can be the pot or the kettle in this conversation -- you pick). > This draft is short and to the point: it's time to stop accommodating > Classic DNS over UDP when writing new protocols that can use encrypted > DNS or Classic DNS over TCP instead. This draft is super short, so > please see it for my arguments. As is, I think it will bring up an interesting discussion. However, I think the end goal seems to be to remove proper engineering for each use case and only provide just a hammer. I'm not sure the DNS is ready to do that. Case in point: the draft seems to point to both stub->resolver and resolver->authoritative as being the same and subject to the same suggestion of "just assume TCP exists". I'm not sure it's wise to lump those two situations together in this document (let alone the other combinations of implementation type labels that can be added to this mix). -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
