Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> writes: > this starts a Call for Adoption for draft-sheth-dns-integration
I have read this document and believe it is a good starting point for a document. I have suggestions to make later about adding more concrete statements and suggestions, but other than that I do consider the concepts important. If adopted, I'm certainly willing to help as I am actively doing some research in this area that proves the points behind the document. I do think for it to be an effective IETF document we need to tailor it toward the IETF audience more, and other documents in other realms can think stronger about governance related issues. Having said that, I think describing what the IETF expects with respect to integrating alternate name spaces along side the DNS is absolutely critical for the IETF to produce a document about (beyond the special use list or .internal or .alt, which are not "conflict" problems, and thus different). To date we only have the IAB document RFC2826 which basically says "don't do this". As we now have industries that specifically are doing it anyway, it's probably time to produce a document that says "ok, if you're going to ignore RFC2826 here are some further suggestions". I agree that there is no perfect place for this document to be housed, and we need to work across the IETF community to get a strong document published. But I do think that DNSOP is likely the best of the choices and thus support it's adoption here. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
