Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Magnus Nyström for their multiple secdir reviews! Section 1.1: The text in this section is not what I expected in a section titled 'document audience'...Is this draft for implementers? operators? My suggestions: move para 1 and 3 (both can go back into Section 1), put para 5 first, and combine para 2 and 4. I will note that this suggestion is to improve readability. Section 4: What do the '[*]' mean? *Section 5: Providing a direct quote from RFC8624 is fine, but then the quote needs to be enclosed in "". And then the authors can't make changes to it, because that makes it a paraphrase, not a quote. My opinion, providing the quote/paraphrase here makes future work harder - harder to keep future drafts in sync. My recommendation is to delete the last three paragraphs and the last phrase of the first paragraph ',which we quote below'. *should have been a discuss? maybe.... _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
