On 13 August 2015 at 07:41, David Nadlinger via dmd-internals < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 7:35, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals wrote: > >> On Thursday, 13 August 2015 at 02:58:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: >> >>> Let's do that then. >>> >> >> Yep, 2.067 sounds good and it seems one of gdc/ldc will have a 2.067 >> before 2.069. >> > > Most definitely. LDC already passes the test suite on x86_64 and we are > currently just cleaning up the fallout of the many half-done > fixes/improvements in 2.067. We could actually even release a beta right > now if it helps you, but it would have a pretty big codegen speed > regression. > > I'd propose that we require ddmd to be compilable with the latest 2 >> versions of dmd/ddmd, e.g. 2.067.x and 2.068.x and with the latest >> available versions of gdc and ldc. >> > > It seems to me that just one version would be enough? > > — David You'd hope so...
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
