I think that's the right thing to do while developing.
On 8/12/2015 7:34 PM, Daniel Murphy via dmd-internals wrote:
I left -release off so that assertions would still trigger, like they
do in the C++ version of dmd.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Martin Nowak via dmd-internals
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 at 12:44:00 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
By the way, I noticed that ddmd is always built in non-release mode, and I
discovered that I can squeeze out more performance by speculatively skipping
unneeded _d_invariant calls.
I already compiled ddmd w/ -release to get my numbers.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
