> On 8 Mar 2026, at 20:59, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we're going in circles here. You're saying there might be value in > ARC worth pursuing, and we won't know unless we try. But for "try" to > happen, there need to be people interested in putting in the work to get to > the answer. I'm not the one that gets to make that call, but I think there's > a dearth of interest in doing so. > > Putting it in the charter doesn't guarantee people will show up to do the > work. In fact, part of chartering a WG is asking "Who will do this work if > we charter it?" and, well, I personally think the answer is plain.
Following on to this. Big mailbox providers have done the work to implement ARC signing on their mail. We’ve heard from a few major mailbox providers they have looked at using the data on the inbound. They aren’t interested in working on more experiments in ARC. I don’t think there’s anything here and we should just end the ARC experiment. laura -- The Delivery Expert Laura Atkins Word to the Wise [email protected] Delivery hints and commentary: http://www.wordtothewise.com/blog
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
