On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 6:25 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a purely academic topic. We can't calculate what developments > would > have occurred if ARC had been better understood or specified. > > Now we can confront demoting ARC against an actual proposal to clarify it > and > put it in use. A showdown where we can weight pros and cons of the two > alternative ways. And an opportunity to resume the proposals that had > been > postponed. > I think we're going in circles here. You're saying there might be value in ARC worth pursuing, and we won't know unless we try. But for "try" to happen, there need to be people interested in putting in the work to get to the answer. I'm not the one that gets to make that call, but I think there's a dearth of interest in doing so. Putting it in the charter doesn't guarantee people will show up to do the work. In fact, part of chartering a WG is asking "Who will do this work if we charter it?" and, well, I personally think the answer is plain. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
