Because your patch was merged after I asked for an override (I didn't want to keep sending minor changes, such as I realized I forgot to fix up the i18n on your surname in the XML before it was uploaded, but I can correct that later).
The patch you provided wasn't meant to address comments from the AD/IESG review, correct? -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel K. <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 8:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: I-D Action: > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-30.txt > > On 3/5/25 01:07, Brotman, Alex wrote: > > I believe this version addresses all known comments from reviewers. If > > folks > believe otherwise, please let me know. > > I believe you may have uploaded an old version, the render date of this one is > March 3rd, and does not match what's on Github. > > > Daniel K. > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
