Hi, > Anyway, it seems that this issue is bound to die in a bikeshedding fest, > so I’ll leave it there, with my apologies to Brazilian users who will > remain unable to log into Django-based websites :-(
Please don't let this issue die because we cannot reach consensus between 60, 100, 192 and 255. That would be silly. Django deserves better. My personal gut feeling is that I prefer something higher than 60 (because why not), but Aymeric has made valid arguments for 60: the practically very relevant example of Portugese / Brazilian names plus some margin. If 60 is a value that allows us to move this forward without making a core developer feel bad about the change, let's go with 60. I'm +1 on any limit 60+ and -1 on keeping the current limit. -- René Fleschenberg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/2774393.GBIKBk3Lu0%40rex. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
