Hi Erik and all,
The approach, indeed, seems fine, which is far from trivial. Some details, of
course, still need to be worked out. I like Aymeric's suggestion re help_text
-- I would take that one step further and allow every validator to give its
own list of requirements.
I have one "devil's advocate" suggestion to consider: Instead of the
validators, let's allow setting the password field. In principle, this should
give us almost the same flexibility, and open some more possibilities (e.g.
widgets that take gesture passwords like some mobile screen-lockers use; using
a composite field to handle confirmation, instead of two separate fields). This
is a completely halfbaked idea, but I thought I'd better put it out here.
Also, there's one point I need to correct:
On Sunday 08 March 2015 16:47:27 Erik Romijn wrote:
>
> In the ticket, Shai described a few particular goals for this feature:
>
I was the last to edit that list, but most of it was actually written by Paul
Mcmillan.
Have fun,
Shai.
