My mistake, sorry. So, to get the conversation back on track, is `2.4.5` acceptable as the minimum version, even if users who
- use CentOS 6 - install dependencies via the OS package manager - don't have sudo/root - can't request the sysadmin to install dev packages; and - keep django at the latest version don't have a valid upgrade path? Thomas On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 12:36:11 AM UTC+11, Florian Apolloner wrote: > > Not exactly, cause installing psycopg2 via the OS package manager should > __not__ require dev packages at all. > > On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 11:57:01 AM UTC+1, Thomas Stephenson wrote: >> >> > Installing psycopg2 does require development tools, while Django does >> not >> >> Installing psycopg2 2.0.0 requires exactly the same `postgres-*-dev` >> libraries that 2.5 does as far as I know. If it is possible to install >> psycopg2 via the OS package manager then 2.5 can be installed via pip. >> >> On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 11:18:56 AM UTC+11, Xof wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Feb 15, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Tim Graham <timog...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Is there a scenario where you could pip install Django but not pip >>> install psycopg2? >>> >>> Installing psycopg2 does require development tools, while Django does >>> not. I'm not offering this as a compelling argument for anything, just an >>> observation. >>> >>> -- >>> -- Christophe Pettus >>> x...@thebuild.com >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/4efc59f0-0b97-4ed9-bbce-bd1b124ea978%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
