On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 16:59 -0700, SmileyChris wrote: > On Oct 29, 2:22 pm, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com> > wrote: > > If we can introduce the terse syntax while maintaining the old syntax > > (including the analogous change in blocktrans), I think it would be a > > worthwhile change. However, I certainly won't complain if public > > opinion sways the other way. > > I've done this here: > http://github.com/SmileyChris/django/compare/master...7817-include-with
Nice work. I also find the '=' format more readable, and definitely appropriate for the reasons given by others. With the others fixed to be consistent Russell's concerns are addressed. It seems only Jannis is opposed to this syntax so far, and several core developers as well as everyone else on the thread prefer it. Are we close enough to "rough consensus" yet? Luke -- I never hated a man enough to give him his diamonds back. (Zsa Zsa Gabor) Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
