On Monday 21 September 2009 20:27:50 Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > No, I think this is precisely correct. I've been meaning to do > exactly what you're proposing for a while myself; just haven't > gotten around to it. > > > decorator_from_middleware isn't actually documented anywhere > > I actually avoided documenting it because it's broken. Once you fix > it, we should (i.e. I will, if you don't have time) document it.
OK, it's committed now. (r11586, r11593) Technically this is a bug fix (#6371), so it ought to get backported to 1.1.X. However, it does actually introduce backwards incompatibilities with cache_page (cache_page still works exactly as documented, but various people were using various undocumented features of it). Also, you could argue it is a new feature - "these decorators now work with methods". So, in light of those things, should it be backported to 1.1.X or not? Luke -- "Pretension: The downside of being better than everyone else is that people tend to assume you're pretentious." (despair.com) Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---