On 1/13/06, Robert Wittams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, I actually liked RequestContext and Context :
+1 > "Simple" implies to me that it is "for the same purpose" as other things > called *Context, but has an easier to understand/trivial implementation. > This isn't really true - its for a different thing. SimpleContext is also not quite descriptive in my opinion. With Context as a base class and RequestContext you know what you are superclassing. At least in my view. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
