On 10 Jan 2006, at 21:24, hugo wrote:
The patch to #914 is just sitting there because there is no comment from the core devs on it - but I think we should do either the unicodefication or the patch from #914, with my preference being the unicodefication.
I’m +1 on the full unicodefication and I’m willing to help implement it.Maybe we could start a “unicode” branch right after “magic-removal” is merged back into the trunk?
-- Antonio
