Antonio Cavedoni пишет: >> The patch to #914 is just sitting there because there is no comment >> from the core devs on it - but I think we should do either the >> unicodefication or the patch from #914, with my preference being the >> unicodefication. > > > I’m +1 on the full unicodefication and I’m willing to help implement it. > > Maybe we could start a “unicode” branch right after “magic-removal” is > merged back into the trunk?
So we will wait until magic-removal branch will be merged back into the trunk?
