Re: Descriptors for fields?

[Radek Svarz]

I am fine with verbose_name etc. I meant pluralization in the code. I was confused with reporter (singular) and articles (plural, which I thought was based on class Article - singular) and thought you want to create lists based on autogenerated plural. => reporter.articles

you can see it here:

>>> reporter.articles.add(headline="John's second story",pub_date=datetime(2005, 7, 29))
>>> article.reporter.id

so I think it should be either:
1.
  reporter.article.add(...)
  article.reporter.id

or:
2.
  reporter.articles.add(...)
  articles.reporter.id

I guess the 1st makes more sence.

Radek

On 12/12/05, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 12/12/05, Radek Svarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> very nice proposal. but please avoid pluralization. it is very odd in other
> languages than English.

I think pluralization is something to be dealt with elsewhere; so long
as this takes advantage of module_name, verbose_name and/or
verbose_name_plural (which I assume it will do) it should be OK for
now, and then if/when a decision is finally reached about how/whether
to handle pluralization, it can be modified if needed.

--
"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
  -- George Carlin