Hi Marc
Marc Paré wrote > >>> OpenID is a foundation and yes, it does provide traffic statistics to >>> its members. In our case TDF/LibreOffice could become a member that >>> dispenses OpenID login/passwords >> >> The fact that it is a "Foundation" does not make it trustworthy per se ;) >> Even so since the traffic generated by a TDF/LO OpenID is collected by >> the >> foundation's servers, the data is available to all, right? > > I think this is the way it works. Although, the foundation TDF does > represent all of us, collectively. Who then can you really trust any > better than yourself? > I was referring to the OpenID Foundation, not to TDF. And I was referring to the traffic data being available to all the OpenID members not to all TDF members. In any case TDF does not represent me since i'm not a member and i have not elected it's members :) I'm just a free user ;) Marc Paré wrote > >> I guess that if I stopped trusting Mozilla I would have to switch >> browser. >> ALL of my online information is typed on a browser programmed by Mozilla. >> Compared to that, only a small portion of the information is in the hands >> of >> Google (and that is why I deliberately don't use Chrome) > > Hmmm, Mozilla makes the bulk of its operating funds from the "Google > Search" window. So when you search from this window, I imagine that > Google is also (with the help of the Mozilla Group) listening in on the > search patterns of FF users. Yes, i'm aware that any search is logged, especially if i'm logged in to my Gmail account on any tab (which i avoid doing). But i was referring to the browser itself. I have to believe that the browser is not logging and sending what i type in my work's webmail or on my website's PMs or any other information typed on the main browser window. If i begin to doubt that, then i will enter into severe paranoia :) Marc Paré wrote > > Regardless of the method, there will always be a primary organism that > will collect the login/password data. In our case, the data we collect > would go towards making the site more accessible and more of a fruitful > event for our users. I don't believe at this point either system is > better or worse. > Of course having a single OpenID for all TDF sites would be a great improvement. But it would still be yet another set of login/password to memorize... And as i said having TDF as the primary organism gives me more confidence than any of the existing OpenID members. But i was referring to the concern of using a TDF OpenID on other sites and having that traffic information shared with to all OpenID corporate members. Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/AskLibO-blitzes-tp3984755p3985318.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
