tqchen commented on code in PR #49:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tvm-ffi/pull/49#discussion_r2376803914
##########
python/tvm_ffi/cython/object.pxi:
##########
@@ -261,29 +263,53 @@ cdef inline object make_ret_opaque_object(TVMFFIAny
result):
(<Object>obj).chandle = result.v_obj
return obj.pyobject()
+cdef inline object make_fallback_cls_for_type_index(int32_t type_index):
+ cdef str type_key = _type_index_to_key(type_index)
+ cdef object type_info = _lookup_type_info_from_type_key(type_key)
+ cdef object parent_type_info = type_info.parent_type_info
+ cdef object cls
+ cdef dict ann
+
+ assert type_info.type_cls is None
+ assert parent_type_info is not None
+
+ warnings.warn(
+ f"Returning type `{type_key}` which is not registered via
`@register_object`, "
+ f"falling back to auto-generated
prototype:\n{type_info.prototype_py()}",
Review Comment:
indeed it can be debatable. Originally I thought we need a warning.
However, now that we have a richer exposures of the class, it effectively
behaves like pybind, and there could be effective usecases for such cxx only
class in JITing scenarios, as a result the note. Alternatively, if we can have
a context that marks this is intentional, which could also be fine. But i think
no warning should also be ok
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
