hal at finney.org wrote: > It's true that there is nothing in the code base now which does this, > and the developers may not want to add any such thing. But after all, > there is nothing in Napster's code that does that, either. Yet the > court is going to force them to run code that adds blocking features. > The court could do the same thing to Americans running Freenet.
That may well turn out to be true. All I'm saying is (and I know you're not suggesting this), there's no point in doing the RIAA/MPAA's work for them before it happens. In fact, making any supposedly defensive moves to go down that road only increase the chances of being forced to do so. I think the OpenNap people are wrong. They're not making it harder to get sued, they're making it easier. theo _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
