Please take this to chat. Ian.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 07:45:51PM +0100, sebsp738 at student.liu.se wrote: > > Listen people: You cannot build a network to allow the free > > publication of > > information in a legal system where the free communication of > > informationis considered a crime, and expect running that network > > to be legal. > > Period. No amount of maneuvering or loophole searching can better this > > situation - either Freenet stops being free, society starts being > > free, or > > Freenet will be outlawed by society. Why do we have to have this > > discussion again and again? > > That is perfectly true, I still think it needs to be discussed what > people should do when they receive a threatening letter of a company > now. > > That`s why I would like to return to my first intention: "Providing a > sample response to some lawyers who threaten people in the current > situation where no court decisions made running Freenet illegal yet". > > I did not want to start the discussion whether we want or should enable > blocking mechanisms, my intention is far more short sighted: Providing > an immediate response which is as bullet proof as it gets in the current > situation. > > Sebastian > P.S. Sorry for using the off-topic devl list > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010228/4574b9f3/attachment.pgp>
