Hi, On 16/01/2025 16:29, Marc Mutz wrote:
On 16.01.25 15:05, Thiago Macieira wrote:On Thursday 16 January 2025 04:55:56 Pacific Standard Time Marc Mutz via Development wrote:https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/6exEonP5o, maybe?Yes.@Ville, @Peppe: do you happen to know whether this is supposed to work (using enum T when T is a typename from the template-initializer), or whether there's a proposal to make it work?
It is actually explicitly forbidden. The proposal itself says
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1099r5.html#wording-changes
"The elaborated-enum-specifier shall not name a dependent type". That clause has been added deliberately, "why enum names must not be dependent types". But I can't seem to find the reasoning behind this...
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
